Problem definition: There's a higher prevalence of preterm births in the USA among pregnant women who smoke.
Implementations and Interventions: Tobacco
usage while pregnant and reducing preterm birth.
The purpose of implementing programs or policies is
to execute a model for those pregnant women or mothers with the issue of
tobacco usage as well as other stakeholders such as prenatal care services and
any member in the community. For these implementations to work, it should be
focused into those key determinants that were looked into and to the
stakeholders as well.
Our main stakeholder is the pregnant woman with the
issue of their behavior and the services that are provided:
·
Screening to all pregnant women for tobacco use and
all receive best practice cessation counseling
This is a policy that should be implemented to all
those pregnant women’s or every woman in their communities should be reinforced
to go. Tobacco usage in general is already bad and screening could prevent it
to these women and to orient them. Also if a women doesn’t smoke and she has
high levels of cotinine it is highly due to second hand smoking. This could be
caused by one of the determinants, environmental, such as her workplace or even
a member in the household which could be even prevented and leading to another
implementing program which is:
·
Education programs for women/partners as well as
health and social services providers.
As well as prenatal care
services will be held, a short term outcome of the program will be that since
these workers know the sighs and symptoms of preterm labors an the appropriate
response they can share the guidelines and labor assessment if the screening
doesn’t look good before the 22 weeks pregnancy.
The Strategy of these two programs combined:
·
Once the
screening is done between the 18 and 22 prenatal weeks, due to their results of
the cotinine levels prenatal class instructions and as well education through
community groups for pregnant women such as Canada Prenatal Nutrition Program
(CPNP), which is already implemented, and it is already taken place.
·
Another strategy
that is used for these women to be aware off.
CDC also helps states and other groups estimate the costs
associated with maternal smoking through its development and promotion of
Maternal and Child Health Smoking Attributable Mortality, Morbidity and
Economic Costs (MCH SAMMEC) software. MCH SAMMEC is an online application that
allows the user to estimate the number of smoking- attributable deaths and
years of potential life lost for infants in the United States, as well as
neonatal medical expenditures for certain user-defined populations.
o
These results will impact these women how the medical
cost is so big and the death poll.
·
A group called National Partnership to Help Pregnant
Smokers Quit aims to improve the understanding of how to intervene the best
practice and postpartum smokers; develop and evaluate more powerful
interventions and strengthen the nation and state based surveillance programs.
o
They’ve also provided a data book to be used for each
state:
§
Prevalence of smoking during pregnancy by the mother’s
ethnicity, age, and education, and the infant’s birth weight;
§
Smoking-attributable infant deaths due to
SIDS;
§
Neonatal illness and health care costs attributable to
smoking.
§
Summary birth statistics; • Medicaid programs for
pregnant women;
§
Federal/state grant programs to reduce smoking-related
adverse outcomes during pregnancy;
§
State cigarette tax and regulatory policies;
§
Maternal and Child Health smoking-cessation programs.
Another intervention:
Preterm Action group, which will include individuals
and organizations.
·
Choose priority areas for action and objectives.
·
Get resources and funding and while the plan is in
action collect data.
This action group will
provide advice and endorsement and to implement the initiative. It is a great
place to network with other women who are also going through the same path as
they are. This intervention will definitely go towards those that have low
income and they have a lack of education such as handling preterm births or
even avoiding. This is a great way to bring a Guest Speakers and women who have
gone through it or even prenatal care workers that could help those in need.
Based on these interventions
we can classify them as which are the ones that it should be tackled first,
meaning which is primary (low) secondary (medium) and tertiary (high):
1)
The first
intervention or a primary intervention will be posting billboards, media or flyers that will show the communities that involve women who are smokers pregnant or not pregnant to stop smoking.
2) The screening should be a secondary prevention. Due to the data collected based on these screenings you can definitely tell what are the progress or the steps that should be taken to make this better or to prevent any risks. As well as to see what are the risks that they are involved as well as avoiding some before having the baby.
3)
Our tertiary intervention are the educational programs for those smokers/partners that
need help and be educated on the second hand smoking (environment determinant)
and how to reach to prenatal care services that are available. Preterm Action group is as well a tertiary intervention meaning that is medium. To be able to prevent or reduce the amount of preterm births, with the results of the screening and the education that will be given to those pregnant women between the 18 and 22 weeks, it could definitely help these women be prepared for the worst. Also low income women will have accessibility to it since it will be help around the communities that these women live in and will have guest speakers that could help them understand and let them know that help is always around. Also prenatal care services will be held for their preterm action group. Also another way is for those women that already had a preterm birth should be reached out by the prenatal care services and avoid any future problem.
I think the primary intervention is correctly placed as such, it will not require much money to perform and still gets the message to the public adequately. The tertiary intervention appears to require the coordination of several stakeholders, and funding of such a product will more than one party involved in it would both make it more difficult to get off the ground and to make actions. I agree that it fits as a tertiary intervention rather than one of higher priority.
ReplyDeleteYou provide great examples of ongoing interventions - especially with the groups you have listed and the things they do.
ReplyDeletePerhaps listing what key determinants are targeted alongside the interventions performed by the groups can make it clearer.
For example, what key determinant(s) does the data book published by National Partnership to Help Pregnant Smokers Quit address?
Listing what is done is great but also remember to mention what determinants a particular intervention targets.
For possible interventions, its good that you identified the primary, secondary and tertiary interventions buts its not clear what key determinants they address.
For example, a primary intervention can be raising cigarette taxes. The key determinant that it addresses would be easily accessible and affordable cigarettes.
If preterm action group is your best chosen intervention, it would be helpful to provide a brief description of what it does.(I think you mentioned it earlier but when addressing your chosen intervention, its helpful to remind us what it is)
Am not sure i follow when you say that '.....the results of the screening and the education that will be given to those pregnant women between the 18 and 22 weeks, it could definitely help these women be prepared for the worst'
What worst are they preparing for? And how is that helpful?